I believe in being nice to people and in helping out when I can. I believe it’s the right thing to do, and I also believe that it pays off in the end so it’s stupid not to.
My philosophical debate of the day is this: does the “paying off in the end” bit cheapen or confirm the “right thing to do” bit? Can it be logical and good at the same time?
This came to mind because twice in the past couple of weeks, one of my advanced students, C, asked for help sending videos of her little daughter out to family in Mexico, and also with getting her hand-me-down laptop to join the library’s wireless network.
To me, these are life skills, most especially when your family lives far away. Limited access is a problem, and when I had the chance to address it for even one person, I couldn’t not. So I had her come in during the afternoon lull and spent maybe an hour and a half total helping her out.
Then Wednesday evening, I had an unprecedented number of new students enrolling, including four men who spoke Spanish but little English. C was there because one of those men was her brother – she brought him in. She helped him understand the application and the mechanics of his test, and when he was good to go, C also helped me with the three other Spanish-speaking students.
So on one hand, what goes around comes around, and it’s amazing to be part of a cycle of such positivity.
On the other hand, I have this very concrete proof that going the extra mile for students yields more students and more helpers. Does this proof suck any “good” there might have been out of my desire to help my students?
I guess what I’m saying is that I don’t know where my motivation to serve my students ends and my motivation to serve myself begins.
At least they’re aligned?